Chronicle-1965

The fielding was reasonably good but far too many vital catches went to ground to our cost. Colledge was as afe wicket-keeper and made two or three fine stumpings off Roseveare's bowling. A word of praise must go to Brookbanks who assisted the side in no small way as a most efficient and enthusiastic scorer. M.A.T. RESULTS vi. Maritzburg College U13B; Lost by 38 runs on 1st innings College: 104 and 83 for 4 decl. Kearsney; 66(Carrington 27)and 40for 5(Carrington 22 n.o.) vs. Harward U13A: Won by 68 runs Kearsney: 151 for 8 decl.(Kirk 31, Storm 23, Roseveare 23) Harward: 83(Roseveare 3for 7) vj. Westville Jnr. 1st XI: Lost by 5 wkts. Kearsney: 92(Carrington 27, Roseveare 23) Westville: 94 for 5(Roseveare 3 for 19) vs. Queensburgh U13A: Won by 50 runs on 1st innings Kearsney: 166 (Carrington 53, Colledge 26, Roseveare 24, Prentice 20) and 88 for 6 decl.(Colledge 45) Queensburgh: 116(Kirk 6 for 52)and 119 for 5 vs.Thomas More U13A: Won by 12 runs Kearsney: 77(Jordan 20) Thomas More: 65(Kirk 5 for 34, Hamilton 3 for 12) V5. Clifton(Dbn.)Prep.2nd XI: Drawn Kearsney: 90for 9 decl.(Carrington 30) Clifton: 71 for 7(Kirk 4for 19)(7 catches dropped!) vs. Treverton 1st: Lost by 5 wkts. Kearsney: 131 (White 33, Carrington 30, Roseveare 28) Treverton: 134for 5 wkts.(Kirk 3 for 19 in 20 overs) vj. Westville Jnr. 1st XI: Drawn Kearsney: 85 for 7 decl. Westville: 85 for 4(Kirk 3 for 19)(Westville needed 5 off the last ball to to win but only managed 4!) UNDER 13'C Unfortunately, this team suffered this quarterfrom lack of regular practice due to their being without a regular coach. M.A.T. RESULTS vs. Westville Jnr.1st: Lost by 162 runs Westville: 180for 9 decl. Kearsney: 18 and 31 for 6 vs. Highbury: Lost by 10 wkts. Kearsney: 41 Highbury: 115 for 5 vs. Cato Ridge: Won by 1 wkt. Cato Ridge: 108(Ghosley 4for 8) Kearsney: 113for 9(Solnick 38) 108

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTc3MDU5Nw==